Tag Archives: patent outsourcing india

Outsourcing of Patent Preparation USPTO

 The following notice is issued by USPTO regarding outsourcing of patent preparation.

The USPTO has become aware that a number of law firms or service provider companies located in foreign countries are sending solicitations to U.S. registered patent practitioners offering their services in connection with the preparation of patent applications to be filed in the United States. Applicants and registered patent practitioners are reminded that the export of subject matter abroad pursuant to a license from the USPTO, such as a foreign filing license, is limited to purposes related to the filing of foreign patent applications. Applicants who are considering exporting subject matter abroad for the preparation of patent applications to be filed in the United States should contact the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) at the Department of Commerce for the appropriate clearances. See MPEP Sec. 140 (8th ed., Rev. 5, Aug. 2006). The BIS has promulgated the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) governing exports of dual-use commodities, software, and technology, including technical data, which are codified at 15 CFR Parts 730-774. Furthermore, if the invention was made in the United States, technical data in the form of a patent application, or in any form, can only be exported for purposes related to the preparation, filing or possible filing and prosecution of a foreign patent application, after compliance with the EAR or following the appropriate USPTO foreign filing license procedure. See 37 CFR 5.11(c). A foreign filing license from the USPTO does not authorize the exporting of subject matter abroad for the preparation of patent applications to be filed in the United States.

The Commissioner for Patents has been delegated the authority for controlling exports of technology for purposes of the filing of patent applications in foreign countries. See 15 CFR 734.3(b)(1)(v) and 734.10(b) and 35 U.S.C. 184. The USPTO grants foreign filing licenses in accordance with USPTO regulations. See 37 CFR Part 5. The scope of a foreign filing license granted by the USPTO is set forth in 37 CFR 5.15. Applicants and registered patent practitioners are also advised that foreign filing licenses (for the filing of a patent application in a foreign country) do not authorize the export of any technology that is not specifically submitted to the USPTO as part of a U.S. patent application or a petition for a foreign filing license. For example, the USPTO has received short abstracts, PowerPoint[supreg] slides and even titles of inventions as the disclosure for which a foreign filing license is requested. Although the USPTO will usually process such requests, any foreign filing license granted under 37 CFR 5.15(a) or 5.15(b) on such short description may not authorize filing abroad the ultimate resulting patent applications and may not authorize any additional
material added after the initial foreign filing license request. Such additional material that was not submitted to the USPTO for its review may be deemed to have altered “the general nature of the invention in a manner which would require such application to be made available for inspection under such section 181.’ See 35 U.S.C. 184.

Patent Outsourcing India

The importance of IP reaches far beyond historically in the past technical industries for several reasons. While not a brand spanking new idea by any stretch (the first U.S. patent was issued in 1790), adequate patent protection has exploded to become of the single most important obligations facing American corporations. With this alter in emphasis has also come the demand for more efficient and cost-effective legal representation for IP related services. Plenty of law firms that used to autonomously dictate exactly how much an inventor or corporation would pay for their services are now finding themselves in a bidding war for the privilege of representing high-dollar clients. Additionally, plenty of corporations have expanded their in-house legal departments to employ full-time IP attorneys and support staff, thereby eliminating the traditional law firm markup. Yet even with these aggressive cost-cutting tactics, U.S. corporations are still looking to economize expensive IP activity in any way feasible.

To some organizations, namely global corporations like Microsoft and General Electric, supplementing patent operations, these companies are already comfortable dealing with the difficulties of offshore operation, and have brilliant infrastructures currently in place to support the implementation of new processes. To most organizations (including law firms), however, sending patent work abroad is a radical departure from what is thought about acceptable practice. The apprehension of these organizations is unquestionable and their concerns are perfectly well-founded; however, the barriers are not insurmountable and ought to be properly understood before any final decisions are made.
Patent Outsourcing Ethical Considerations
The most obtrusive barrier stopping universal acceptance of patent outsourcing is grounded in ethical considerations. While not always purely legal in nature, patent related work ought to always be thought about legal because at the most essential level, patents are in fact legal instruments. Arguably, all activity related to the preparation, prosecution, maintenance, and litigation of patents is legal activity in some capacity, because such activity will ultimately affect the applicants intellectual property rights. As such, attorneys who are involved with outsourcing patent work must be diligent in ensuring ethical obligations are maintained at all times.

CLick here to read the complete article Patent Outsourcing India