Category Archives: Company Law India

Company Bill 2012 India

In view of the changes in the national and international economic environment and expansion and growth of the Indian economy, the Central Government seeks to replace the 56 years old Companies Act, 1956 (“Act”) by a new Companies Act of 2012 which is currently in the form of Companies Bill, 2012 (“Bill”). This Bill marks a seminal shift in India’s corporate regime and aims at repairing and fine tuning the existing lacunae of the Act by establishing a new benchmark for corporate governance and by introducing new concepts such as One Person Company, independent directors, etc. The Bill has already been passed by the Lok Sabha on December 18, 2012 and now awaits the approval of the Rajya Sabha and the Presidential assent.  Below are a few salient features of the Bill. One Person Company: Keeping pace with the international developments, the Bill introduces a completely new category of company called ‘One Person Company’ (“OPC”) i.e. a company with a single member. The introduction of the concept of OPC may completely change the manner in which traditional and household businesses function, with individuals preferring to structure their business in the form of companies instead of sole proprietorship. Compulsory appointment of one Resident Director: The Bill provides that at least one director must be a person who has stayed in India for a total period of not less than 182 days in the previous calendar year. Thus Indian companies which had only foreign directors on their board would now be required to appoint at least one resident director.  Independent Directors: Post the famous Satyam fiasco, the Bill has now introduced higher standards of corporate governance for Indian companies by including express provisions pertaining to independent directors alongside provisions which will ensure that the independence of such directors is maintained. In addition the Bill also provides for the duties of a director and imposes greater degree of responsibility on the management of the company. Outbound Mergers: One of the significant drawbacks of setting up businesses in India was the restriction on outbound merger of an Indian company with a foreign company. The Bill permits such merger of an Indian company with a foreign company of a specified jurisdiction thereby making the Indian corporate
environment more suitable and flexible for restructuring of group operations. Class Action Proceedings: In a noteworthy development, the Bill now introduces the concept of class action suits whereby certain members or depositors could initiate action on behalf of the other members or depositors against the company, its directors, auditors and/or advisors, experts, consultants seeking a wide variety of reliefs including damages. Corporate Social Responsibility: Keeping in mind the interests of the society wherein the companies operate and
with an aim to foster a culture of social responsibility, the Bill incorporates provisions regarding corporate social responsibility (“CSR”) whereby certain companies may be required to set up CSR Committees and make efforts towards spending certain specified amounts on CSR activities and policy. Insider trading: A new clause has been introduced with respect to prohibition of insider trading of securities by a Director or a Key Managerial Personnel. Any non-compliance of such provisions could be a criminal offence. In addition to the above, the Bill also seeks to strike off various provisions of the Act, which have outlived their utility. The Bill introduces a plethora of new concepts such as rotation of auditors, registered valuer etc. which are primarily aimed at alienating the bottlenecks which were present in the Act. Whilst the Bill is indeed a welcome
change, there are a few wrinkles that need to be creased out. It is pertinent to note that the Bill provides wide ranging powers to the Central Government, by allowing it to administer the provisions of the proposed Act by way of rules to be framed by it, which rules are yet to be released. Majority of the clauses of the Bill are subject to rules which are yet to be prescribed. Therefore, the implementation of the provisions of the Bill and their consequent impact remains largely to be tested, only after the Bill is notified as an Act and the related rules have been prescribed. On account of the same, its too early to give a
verdict on whether the Bill will take India Inc a step further or backwards towards globalization.

Employment of Contract Labour Law India

The employment of Contract Labour has become an integral part of industry particularly in the present mega competition in internal and international market and also the desire of Government to boost export. The requirement of labour is always uncertain in view of the fluctuation in the market conditions. This need is always met through Contract Labour.

Realizing the need of employment of Contract Labour in industry and for regulation of their conditions of service, the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970 was enacted. The Act provides provisions of regulation of Contract Labour and also empowers the appropriate Government to abolish the system of contract labour in any particular process(es) in any industry. The law on Contract Labour has been influenced by various judgements of High Courts and the Supreme Court. Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970 and the Rules, made thereunder;

 

Director DIN Number

General Circular No: 32/2011 dated 31/05/2011, 66/2011 Dated 4/10/2011,  70/2011 dated 15.12.2011 and 04/2012 dated 09.03.2012, Ministry of Corporate Affairs has mandated providing Income-tax Permanent Account Number (Income-tax PAN) for obtaining Director Identification Number (DIN) in case of Indian nationals. All existing DIN holders who have not furnished their PAN earlier at time of obtaining DIN are also required to furnish PAN details by filing DIN-4 form on MCA21 by 30th April, 2012.  In addition, in case of those DIN holders who have furnished their PAN earlier, there may be mismatch between particulars provided in their DIN application (i.e. name or father’s name or date of  birth) with Income Tax  PAN details.  Such DIN holders are also required to correct their particulars in DIN data base by filing Form DIN4; In case of correction needed in PAN data base, they need to apply to Income Tax authorities and then file correct information with MCA21 using DIN4 form. This activity is also to be completed by 30th April, 2012. E-mails have been sent to such DIN holders who are covered in the above categories, viz non-availability of PAN or mismatch of PAN with DIN, and whose    e-mail addresses are available in the MCA21 system.  However, there are such DIN holders also whose e-mail addresses are not available in MCA21 system.  All such cases of non-availability of PAN or mismatch between PAN and DIN have been made available in MCA21 Portal.   You are advised to visit the MCA21  Portal to check your details and to file the DIN4 form wherever required.  Filing information under DIN4 form is free of any charges. Non-provision of PAN details or any mismatch in DIN and PAN  information will be treated as default and such DINs may be disabled for
access of MCA21 System after 30th April, 2012.

Increase in authorized capital of Company India

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 642(1) read with Section 610B of the Companies Act, 1956 have amended the Companies (Central Government’s) General Rules and Forms 1956 to substitute the Form No 5 which is filed for Notice of consolidation, division, etc. or increase in share capital or increase in number of members.

The highlight of the amendment is as follows:

The increase in authorized share capital of any company which is registered in New Delhi would not attract any  payment of stamp duty.

The above is pursuant to the order of the Hon’ble High Court of New Delhi passed in the matter of S E Investments Limited Vs Union of India and Others [ W.P. (c) 2393/2010 and CM Appl. 4794/2011] whereby it was held that there is no provision in the Delhi Stamp Act for payment of stamp duly on “increase in authorized capital”.
The above rules are effective from 25 September 2011.

Filing of Company’s Balance Sheet and Annual Return to ROC

The companies are required to file their Balance Sheet and Annual Return to ROC within 30 and 60 days respectively from the date of placing it in the Annual General Meeting.  The companies that follow the standard financial year ending up-to March each year are required to convene the AGM by September of that year.  However, most of the companies do not utilize the 30 and 60 days allowed for filing their documents but instead, keep waiting up to last date to file their Balance Sheet and Annual Return.  The avoidable delay in filing thus creates an artificial rush and results in heavy filing on the last dates of October and November each year.  Moreover, these documents being of large size take a long time to upload.  This makes it difficult for others to file their documents on-line.
To avoid last minute rush and system congestion in MCA21 due to heavy filing in
last 10 days of the months of October and November 2011, it is requested that filing of Balance Sheet and Annual Return may preferably be done in the following order:

Preferable Date   for Filing

Company Names
starting with

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

Alphabets A to D

 

All the days during the month 1st Oct to 05 Oct
2011
1st Nov to 05 Nov
2011
Alphabets E to K

do

6th Oct to 10th
Oct 2011
6th Nov to 10th
Nov 2011
Alphabets L to Q

do

11th Oct to 15th
Oct 2011
11th Nov to 15th
Nov 2011
Alphabets R & S

do

16th Oct to 20th
Oct 2011
16th Nov to 20th
Nov 2011
Alphabets T to Z

do

21st Oct to 25th
Oct 2011
21st Nov to 25th
Nov 2011
Remaining/ Left out companies

do

26th Oct to 31st
Oct 2011
26th Nov to 30th
Nov 2011

Kindly plan your filing accordingly.